This past Friday, I predicted which AL teams deserved the “Overachiever,” “Underachiever,” and “Dark Horse” tags. Today, I thought it’d be fun to venture into that parallel bizzaro-world of baseball often referred to as the National League and do the same.

Overachiever | I was torn on this one but ultimately decided to stick with my original selection, the Milwaukee Brewers. With the Zack Grienke and acquisitions still fresh in mind, the rotation (which also includes and ) is beginning to look awfully competitive. Offensively, the production should be decent if the heart of the lineup (, Ryan Braun, , and ) can produce in the near proximity of their projections. With entering his walk year, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some career numbers out of him; PECOTA forecasts him at a .274/.391/.527 triple slash with 38 long balls. Given the distinct possibility that Prince will depart for greener pastures in 2012 and the farm system taking a substantial hit this past winter, this coming season seems like an ideal opportunity for the Brew Crew to aim high.

Underachiever | If there’s one thing that the Vegas betting lines consistently demonstrate, it’s the idea that choosing the field instead of the favorite typically pans out. And I assure you, after building a rotation comprised of , , and , Ruben Amaro has . It’s for this very reason that the “underachiever” award goes to the Philadelphia Phillies. I’m predicting expecting the Phillies to fall short of their (and everyone else’s) World-Series-or-bust expectations. Even if the pitching is as advertised, other legitimate hurdles still need to be addressed. These uncertainties mostly revolve around the offense, as the team will quickly discover whether (PECOTA projects a triple slash of .263/.325/.434 in 2011) can fill ’s $126M shoes, Jimmy Rollins can bounce back from a rather underwhelming 2010 campaign (.243/.320/.374), and ’s stays in good health.

Dark horse | I finally have an excuse to talk about the St. Louis Cardinals. The Cards held strong last year through August, ending the day of Saturday, August 14, tied for first place. It was the last time they’d be at the top of the division, as the Reds pulled away and never relinquished their division lead. While the Cards didn’t make any enormous splashes during the offseason, they did acquire ; although, I don’t think anyone in their right mind has high hopes for his outfield capabilities at this juncture (but that’s a conversation for another blog). The Big Puma will, however, add some solid OPS (career .296/.409/.545/.954) to an offensive line already littered with some stellar offensive players (i.e., , , and oh yeah, ). Moreover, anytime a team has a top three of , and young-gun (PECOTA projects a 3.96 ERA/4.19 FIP/1.39 WHIP for Garcia’s sophomore campaign), there’s reason for optimism. Although I have no particular affinity toward , I’ll concede that he too should remain at the very least serviceable within the NL Central. If the Cards match their potential, there’s no reason why they can’t absolutely compete with the Reds or Brewers and vie for first place in the division.

4 Responses to 2011 Predictions (Overachievers, Underachievers, Dark horses) — Part II

  1. Jack Jones says:

    Great stuff Matt. I am really high on the Brew Crew this year as well. Braun has to be happy to finally get some pitching in there to help out the lineup.

    Philadelphia has their minds set on nothing less than a World Series this year, and while they are probably the favorites I like your prediction on them underachieving.

    St. Louis is in a tough division. Wainwright and Carpenter are a solid 1-2 and Pujols and Halladay form a nice punch in the lineup, but not quite as solid up and down as some of the other NL teams.

    [Reply]

    Matt Warden Reply:

    Thanks for stopping by Jack. I appreciate the feedback. I wasn’t sure how people were going to react to the Phillies “underachiever” pick, but I think it’s reasonable. As a Yankee fan, I’m all to familiar with the “World Series or Bust” mantra, and I have to admit it’s a pretty tough standard to uphold.

    [Reply]

  2. SoxGuy says:

    Another Dark Horse to consider is the Mets. Stop laughing . . . catch your breath . . . OK, here goes.

    With the Braves and Phils expected to have strong seasons everyone has written off the Bernie Madoff ravaged Mets. Consider this though:
    – Reyes and Beltran are playing for contracts this year. Expect big, healthy years from each.
    – Ike Davis should turn in a strong sophomore year and solidify himself as John Olerud 2.0.
    – The pitching, in that park, isn’t quite as bad as everyone thinks it is. It’s not great, but it’s not horrific either.
    – Sandy Alderson is used to working with limited funds and continues to be one of the smartest GMs in the game

    I’m not saying they’re going to win 90 games but it wouldn’t shock me if they’re in the wild-card hunt through the greater part of September.

    Now if they could just convince the Angels to take on Castillo and Perez . . .

    [Reply]

    Matt Warden Reply:

    I wouldn’t bet on it, Sox Guy.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Blog WebMastered by All in One Webmaster.