(The following is being syndicated from The Captain’s Blog).

The longer the Yankees’ offensive malaise continues, the more it becomes confusing. Over a three-week period that has seen the team’s per game production plummet by almost two runs, no one explanation has been evident. Nonetheless, there must be something that stands out as a reasonable cause for the batting slump that most of the team is currently enduring.

After scanning the Yankees’ season splits in 2011, one number jumps out more than any other. In 30 plate appearances with a 3-0 count, the Yankees haven’t recorded a single hit. Of course, that statistics is misleading because the team has walked in 90% of those instances, or just a shade below the league average. So, when compared to the league’s performance on 3-0 (.366/.955/.761), it appears as if the Yankees have only missed out one or two hits. What’s more, the Yankees won all three games when those 3-0 outs occurred, so this split has played no role in the larger trend.

Yankees sOPS+ in Three-Ball Counts

Split PA AB HR BA OBP SLG sOPS+
3-0 Count 30 3 0 0.000 0.900 0.000 -6
3-1 Count 87 44 3 0.386 0.686 0.682 99
Full Count 243 156 8 0.199 0.477 0.385 130
After 3-0 79 31 4 0.258 0.709 0.710 142
After 3-1 166 95 7 0.253 0.570 0.526 111
Three Balls 360 203 11 0.236 0.563 0.443 114

Note: sOPS+ is a measurement that compares the Yankees performance in a particular split to the league average.
Source: Baseball-reference.com

Even after an awful weekend in which the Yankees struggled mightily on three ball counts, the team’s related OPS splits are at least on par with the rest of the league. So, although the inability to do damage on 3-1 did hurt the Yankees over the past weekend, it has not been a systemic problem.

With yet another theory dismissed, one more observation bears closer examination. A lot has been made of the Yankees’ scoring too many runs via the long ball, which is an inherently silly argument. However, is it possible that the team is trying too hard to go deep? Although this tendency is difficult to identify in the numbers, one manifestation might be a decline in off-field production at the expense of pulling the ball. In other words, instead of letting the homeruns come naturally, the Yankees may be forcing the issue.

wOBA Relative to Hit Placement, 2002-2011

Source: fangraphs.com

The Bronx Bombers have been very successful at pulling the ball so far this season, but the team’s hitters have fallen behind the league when it comes to going up the middle and using the opposite field. Over the first 38 games, the Yankees rank near the bottom of the majors with a wOBA of .255 on balls hit the other way and in the middle of the pack with a wOBA of .336 on balls hit to center. In terms of sOPS+, the team ranks below average in both categories.

sOPS+ Splits Based on Hit Placement

Split PA AB HR BA OBP SLG sOPS+
Pulled-RHB 124 123 12 0.463 0.463 0.870 142
Up Mdle-RHB 248 244 7 0.250 0.246 0.365 76
Opp Fld-RHB 86 82 2 0.268 0.256 0.390 85
Pulled-LHB 181 176 29 0.409 0.407 0.972 153
Up Mdle-LHB 276 275 10 0.280 0.280 0.462 106
Opp Fld-LHB 100 97 0 0.247 0.240 0.351 62

Note: sOPS+ is a measurement that compares the Yankees performance in a particular split to the league average.
Source: Baseball-reference.com

So, if the Yankees have become too one dimension, who, in particular, is to blame. Unfortunately, the answer is the entire team. While ever regular but Derek Jeter is off the charts when it comes to pulling the ball, only Brett Gardner has a wOBA above .320 on balls to the opposite field. A handful of batters have also had success going up the middle, but for the most part, damage on offense has usually come from getting the bat head out early.

Yankees’ Offensive Breakdown, by Hit Location

  Pull Center AB Opposite
Player AB wOBA  AB wOBA AB wOBA
Alex Rodriguez 43 0.452 29 0.335 26 0.32
Andruw Jones 12 0.608 9 0.298 5 0.179
Brett Gardner 27 0.394 30 0.348 29 0.353
Curtis Granderson 53 0.676 32 0.447 18 0.229
Derek Jeter 35 0.278 56 0.299 41 0.273
Eduardo Nunez 9 0.384 5 0.358 4 0.224
Eric Chavez 12 0.149 10 0.521 8 0.432
Francisco Cervelli 6 0.213 3 0.704 2 0.448
Gustavo Molina 2 0.640 4 0.000 0 NA
Jorge Posada 35 0.441 28 0.249 16 0.112
Mark Teixeira 58 0.527 27 0.329 21 0.265
Nick Swisher 40 0.349 23 0.289 35 0.242
Robinson Cano 50 0.573 36 0.401 32 0.198
Russell Martin 38 0.591 28 0.279 20 0.173

Source: fangraph.com

Is the root cause of the current struggles an inability to use all fields?  It’s worth noting that over the last 10 years, wOBA on balls hit to the opposite field does have a meaningful positive correlation to runs scored, while the same metric for the other two splits does not. Of course, correlation doesn’t always imply causation, but if the Yankees are going to continue to perform so poorly on balls served the other way, they’ll have no choice but to either pull the ball even more or compensate by being even more productive when they do.

 

One Response to Splitting Hairs: A(nother) Granular Look at the Yankees’ Slump

  1. Duh, Innings! says:

    Bottom line is the Yankees starting nine has one bonafide .300+ hitter: Cano and two bonafide high OBP guys: Teixiera and Gardner.

    This team is all about the homerun.

    The Yankees need a new 3B, SS, RF, and DH.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Blog WebMastered by All in One Webmaster.