Looking forward to a back-end battle

By On September 22, 2011 · 7 Comments · In General Musings, Roster Decisions

If you really sit back and think about it, a Spring Training battle for any position should mean absolutely nothing. Not only is the sample size absurdly small, but the results obtained are against lineups and/or pitching staffs that are either warming up or severely compromised because of split-squads, guys getting eased into things, etc. But then again, the assumption I just made is based on the idea that Spring Training battles are all about results. Sure, results matter, but those battles are more about process than anything.

Regardless of iffy results and sketchy process, we all enjoy a good Spring Training position/rotation fight. Why? For a few reasons, I guess. First of all, it gives us something to talk about. Let’s face it, as pumped as we get for Spring Training, it can be anti-climactic; it can be dull; it can be a time where there’s just nothing to talk about. While I generally argue against the overuse of narratives (ironic considering my choice of profession, no?), it’s fun to indulge yourself in one every so often and Spring Training gives us a chance to do that. The battles for a bench spot or a rotation spot or the last spot in the bullpen provide us with a story to buy into.

Second of all, it’s nice to have choices. Spring training battles give us choices. You have this guy who does A, B, and C well as opposed to this other guy who does X,Y, and Z well. These manufactured contests also give us a great chance to be surprised: “Wow, I didn’t know he could do that!” “Huh, I’d forgotten about him. Glad I got to take a look.” It looks like we’re gearing up for a competition for the back end of the Yankee rotation.

Assuming returns after opting out of his contract, he, , and are the only players who will have guaranteed rotation spots. That leaves two open for a bunch of options. If the Yankees sign Yu Darvish or or someone else, one of them will get the spot. That would leave one spot open for a bunch of guys (or two if the Yankees don’t add anyone). I should also mention and . They haven’t pitched all too well of late, but they’ve done well enough that they are at least under consideration for return. However, I think with their recent, relative struggles, the Yankees would rather let them go a year early than a year late.

No matter how many spots are open, the Yankees will have a lot of candidates to vie for that (those) spot(s). will definitely be one of them, and I assume we’ll also see competing for that spot. We could also see Manny Banuelos or Dellin Betances turn heads. Adam Warren will make some noise and other guys could emerge as well. Plus, we don’t know if any other trades or free agent signings are going to be made between the end of the season and the start of Spring Training.

A bunch of narratives could be sprung forth from those candidates. Will competition force Hughes to refine tertiary pitch? Can Noesi translate as a starter? Would the Yankees consider letting Banuelos or Betances make the jump to the big leagues? Will some other buy-low option emerge a la Garcia/Colon? This season isn’t over yet, and I’m already excited for next Spring Training.

Tagged with: • • • • • • • • •
 
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
Delicious Digg

7 Responses to Looking forward to a back-end battle

  1. Nick says:
    September 22, 2011 at 11:21 am

    i really dont know if burnett’s spot is guaranteed.

    Reply
  2. Joe G says:
    September 22, 2011 at 11:28 am

    Though history has told us Japanese pitchers success rate in MLB can be dicey (no pun intended), I still hope they go after Darvish. With the recent backlash, I wouldn’t be surprised if he comes cheaper than the sox got Dice-K.

    Sure he has a lot of innings on his arm, but he seems like he’d be a lot of fun to watch from everything I’ve read. But I’ll trust the scouts opinion on whether or not the Yankees make a play. Key IMO is if he’s willing to pitch inside and not be intimidated. Dice K tended to nibble away, which explained his short outings most of the time.

    Reply
  3. Justice Beaver says:
    September 22, 2011 at 11:30 am

    Manny threw 130 innings this year, with his smallish frame it would be extremely foolish to push him anymore then 170. To avoid running into problems later in the year, they should, at the very least “David Price him” and let him pitch 5 innings a start at AAA for 2 months, before promoting him to control his innings.

    Reply
  4. whocarestom says:
    September 22, 2011 at 11:59 am

    I really hope we don’t sign C.J. Wilson.

    Reply
  5. David, Jr. says:
    September 22, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    A very good article. It seems weird to look forward this morning, but that is an interesting topic.

    I believe that Noesi can make it. He is a bulldog type like Nova, with maybe even better stuff.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.