(The following is being syndicated fromThe Captain’s Blog; follow me on Twitter at).

Overlooked in the Yankees’ weekend sweep of the Athletics was the not so subtle implication by Joe Girardi that left fielder Brett Gardner could wind up missing at least six more weeks of the season. Gardner’s return will largely depend on how he feels after swinging the bat this afternoon in Tampa, but regardless of the outcome, it’s time for the Yankees to proactively address the team’s glaring weaknesses in the outfield.

DeJesus would be an ideal catch for the Yankees.

Last year, just about every defensive metric pegged Brett Gardner as one of the best defensive outfielders in baseball. Meanwhile, Raul Ibanez was widely rated as one of the worst. Not surprisingly, this trade off has proven costly to the Yankees. Entering the season, Brian Cashman hoped to rely on the DH-platoon of Ibanez and Andruw Jones as outfield depth, but each player’s limitations have made that strategy unviable. As a result, Girardi has often been forced to choose between two very unattractive options: weaken the defense by playing Ibanez in the field or shorten the lineup by going with Jayson Nix or Dewayne Wise.

The Memorial Day standings reveal a high level of parity throughout the game. That bodes well for an exciting pennant race, but it could also signal a lackluster trade deadline. With more buyers than sellers, not only will fewer players be available at the deadline, but the costs could escalate as well.  So, instead of waiting for the trade market to evolve, why not make a pre-emptive strike?

It isn’t easy to make a deal in May because most teams aren’t quite ready to pull the plug. However, that’s not the case for the Chicago Cubs, who have seemingly been in a seller’s mode since the first week of the season. What’s more, considering the close relationship between Cubs’ President Theo Epstein and Yankees’ GM Brian Cashman, the groundwork for a deal should be easy to establish. Now, all that’s left is to identify a trade target. And, as luck would have it, the Cubs just so happen to have a player who meets the Yankees’ need: David DeJesus.

The Brooklyn-born DeJesus is far from a superstar, but over a 10-year major league career, he has established himself as an above average hitter capable of playing solid defense at every outfield position.  Because of this versatility, DeJesus would be a viable starter while the team is shorthanded and then transition to a super-sub once Gardner returns. Above all else, he would provide depth for every outfield position and, just as importantly, ensure that the Yankees would not have to compromise their outfield by playing Ibanez in the field. This would also have the added benefit of allowing Jones and Ibanez to concentrate on their intended role as a DH platoon and make both players available to pinch hit more often.

David DeJesus’ Playing Time Distribution

Source: fangraphs.com

In addition to being a perfect fit on the current roster, DeJesus could also provide a backup plan for 2013. With one more guaranteed year at $4.25 million (and a 2014 option for $6.5 million), DeJesus would be a cheaper alternative should the team decide that Nick Swisher’s free agent demands are too exorbitant. Also, because the commitment to DeJesus isn’t significant, the Yankees could still afford to re-sign Swisher or pursue another free agent outfielder like Josh Hamilton or Andre Ethier.

Considering the flexibility he would provide both during and after the season, making a play for DeJesus seems like a no-brainer, depending, of course, on what the Cubs ask for in return. If GM Jed Hoyer and Epstein hold out for a blue chip like Mason William or Manny Banuelos, Cashman would have no choice but to walk away. However, it doesn’t seem likely that the Cubs would demand so high a price, especially in light of the extensive rebuilding process they will need to undertake. As a result, the Yankees might be able to come away with DeJesus for a more marginal prospect. Would an arm like D.J. Mitchell or Adam Warren be enough to get a deal done? How about Francisco Cervelli? It can’t hurt to ask, which is exactly what Cashman should be doing now.

 

4 Responses to Cubs’ DeJesus a Perfect Fit for Yankees; Would Help Fill Outfield Void

  1. Eric Schultz says:

    DeJesus would definitely be an interesting target, but I think the price would be substantially higher than Mitchell/Warren/Cervelli. He is a player with defensive versatility and above-average offensive production, signed for the next two years at a reasonable contract. I’m not sure there is that much incentive for the Cubs to deal him unless they receive an “offer they can’t refuse”, and I imagine there would be other bidders.

    I don’t think DeJesus warrants dealing one of the top guys (Banuelos/Williams/Sanchez), but I would think that the Cubs would be interested in getting guys with a little more upside than what someone like Warren, Mitchell, or Cervelli offer. I don’t know if it makes sense to deal major pieces for a guy who will be the 4th outfielder when Gardner returns, but I do see potential value as a Swisher replacement if the price gets too high.

  2. Bill says:

    I’m not sure Dejesus is a fit at all. He’d make a fine replacement for Gardner while Gardner is out, but then what do you do with him?
    He’s a lefty with pretty severe platoon splits, meaning he would make no sense as a backup to an OF featuring 2 lefties and a switch hitter who thus far this season is hitting much better from the left side.
    Also, where would he fit on the roster when Gardner returns?
    Assuming Ibanez, Gardner, Granderson, and Swisher are all primary starters, that would leave a 4-man bench of Jones, Chavez, Stewart, and Nix. I seriously doubt the Yankees would reduce to a six man bullpen for the rest of the season, so Dejesus would have to displace a current member of the bench. Obviously, he couldn’t replace Nix or Stewart because they need a backup middle IF and backup C. It doesn’t make sense for him to replace Jones given the lefties in the OF and at DH. The only possibility would be to replace Chavez, which given how much they seem to like resting ARod makes zero sense. Their would be no room on the roster for Dejesus once Gardner got back.

  3. bottom line says:

    Cubs would of course make exorbitant demands but would be very fortunate get, say, Brett Marshall for DeJesus. Could be a core piece for them for six years. Not an ance but a solid starterto build around for a solid but unspectacular aging outfielder who is taking them nowhere.

  4. I don’t think Mitchell or Warren or Marshall would be unreasonable at all. This is actually a great idea and I think they should explore it if Gardner goes on the shelf for another six weeks. I wouldn’t go much higher than Mitchell, Warren, or Marshall though because Brett Gardner will eventually be back and DeJesus is not a viable replacement for Swisher.

    DeJesus is a solid fielder who is very good at getting on base and has hit for average in the past. His .287/.381 line would look good in the nine hole of the Yankees lineup too. Much better than Nix or Wise.

    Good call on his one William.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.