While it doesn’t make much of a difference at the end of the year, playing around with the lineup is something we always like to contemplate. I’ve said it a thousand times, and I’m sure every other writer on the site has, too: the difference between an optimized lineup and a non-optimized lineup is very small at the end of the year. Still, that doesn’t mean that changes shouldn’t be made at certain times. Is now a time for the Yankees to change the lineup a little bit? The focus is going to be on a few hitters, who all have top-of-the-lineup potential but either aren’t there or maybe don’t belong there. Let’s start at the top. (All numbers represent player totals BEFORE last night’s game vs. Detroit)

started the year as the leadoff hitter; a slow start, however, forced him out of that role and re-relegated him to the bottom of the lineup. Since the Baltimore series (fun with arbitrary end points!), though, he’s been hitting well. Since 4/23, Gardner’s hitting .385/.543/.800. Obviously, that power isn’t going to stick around and while Gardner will likely always draw his fair share of walks, an IsoD that’s knocking on the door of .200 isn’t going to last either. But the point remains, if being cold moved Gardner down in the lineup, shouldn’t being hot move him back up in the lineup?

As we all know, currently occupies the top spot in the lineup, and many (most?) of us aren’t exactly happy with that. Since that Baltimore series, Jeter is hitting .300/.356/.325. The power still isn’t coming around, but he is getting more hits. We should note, though, that a lot of those hits have been of the infield variety (12.1% of his total hits have been IF hits; he has 8 total on the year, trailing Ichiro’s AL leading mark of 9) and his line drive percentage is still low at 12%. He has cut down on the grounders a bit, down to 71.7%, but that mark is still the highest in the AL by about 6%. The only thing keeping Jeter in the leadoff spot right now is his name, and that’s not fair. He’s starting to come around, but it doesn’t look like getting him the most PAs on the team is going to be helpful going forward.

and have a platoon working in the two spot right now, which I’m more or less fine with, especially since Swisher is ripping lefties this year. However, I wonder if it’s time to consider a move up in the order for . He’s still hitting well and since the Baltimore series, he’s hitting .250/.368/.500. I don’t expect the power to stay there, but he’s coming around with the walks and that’s what’s needed towards the top of the lineup. Still, I can’t argue much with the Swisher/Granderson platoon in the two spot, and I won’t be devastated when Martin is not moved up in the lineup.

Here are two possible “lineup alternatives” the Yankees could employ:

vs. RHP:

1. Gardner, LF
2. Granderson, CF
3. , 1B
4. , 3B
5. , 2B
6. Martin, C
7. Swisher, RF
8. , DH
9. Jeter, SS

vs. LHP

1. Swisher, RF
2. Gardner, LF (reverse platoon split this year, career .356 OBP v. LHP)
3. Tex, 1B
4. Rodriguez, 3B
5. Cano, 2B
6. Granderson, CF
7. Jeter, SS
8. Posada, DH (.056 wOBA vs. lefties in ’11)
9. Martin, C (reverse platoon split thus far)

I would be nothing on either one of these lineups happening, but I think they’re still viable alternatives for the time being. Like everything else in baseball, the lineup should be something flexible. As long as you’re not moving the three best hitters–Tex, A-Rod, and Robbie–around too much, you should be alright.

4 Responses to Time to tinker with the lineup?

  1. Meowy Wowy says:

    I would do:
    Gardner
    Swisher
    Teix
    A-Rod
    Cano
    Granderson
    Martin
    Posada
    Jeter

  2. Justice Beaver says:

    Gardner
    Swisher
    Cano
    Arod
    Teix
    Granderson
    Martin
    Posada
    Jeter

    • T.O. Chris says:

      I don’t understand why you guys would put Swisher in the two hole when Granderson has clearly shown you what he can do for this team in the two hole. He brings a possible 30-20, and the very least a 25-10 bat to the top of the lineup. I understand everyone wants Gardner leading off but honestly I would much rather make Granderson a comfortable producing member of the lineup over getting Gardner an extra AB or two per game.

      The only problem I have with your RHP lineup Matt is that it makes the top of the lineup completely vulnerable to a left handed reliever. Teams can plan to bring in a lefty reliever as the lineup rolls around and negate both Gardner and Granderson, and then leave that reliever in to turn Teixeira away from the short porch, and make him bat from his weaker side.

      Also Matt I wouldn’t consider 4 hits in 10 ABs for Gardner against lefties a “reverse split”, it’s just too small a sample size.

      If I’m making major changes then you almost have to have Swisher leadoff, or leave Jeter in that spot, and no one (including me) wants to do either.

      The only thing I want to be a lock is Grandy in the two hole Vs right handed bats because he is a such a fire starter at the top of the order, and AFTER Alex, Teixeria and Robbie, I feel Granderson is the most important bat to our teams success.

      Vs RHP
      Swisher
      Granderson
      Teixeira
      Rodriguez
      Cano
      Martin
      Jeter
      Posada
      Gardner

      VS LHP
      Jeter
      Swisher
      Teixeira
      Rodriguez
      Cano
      Jones
      Martin
      Posada
      Granderson

  3. Marcus says:

    I’ve said it on Twitter and I’ll mention it here: flip Cano and Tex. Thanks. Marcus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.