Red Sox top Yanks in 9-5 see-saw game

By On September 1, 2011 · 11 Comments · In Game Recaps

All you really need to know. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

The Yankees finally broke through against , touching the righty up for five runs (four earned) over seven innings, but it wouldn’t be enough to overcome another shaky outing by , as the Bombers fell to the Red Sox on Wednesday night.

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of this game was that Hughes started out like a man possessed, blowing out-of-nowhere 95mph fastballs past the Boston hitters, and picking up two strikeouts in the first inning (including four swinging strikes, all on the heater) but as Hughes’ velocity dipped so did his performance. I was all set to be quite content with Phil’s outing as he appeared poised to get through five innings having given up only two runs, but had other ideas, launching a terribly located four-seamer into dead center field for his eight trillionth career home run against the Yankees to extend Boston’s lead to 4-1.

The Yankees battled back in the top of the sixth, scoring four runs due in part to a huge two-run triple double, but despite handed a 5-4 lead in the bottom of the 6th Hughes couldn’t shut the door. After retiring , came back from an 0-2 hole to work a walk, which wound up being the turning point in the game. The corpse of somehow got his bat on a curveball that was way out of the zone and took a funky hop, enabling Reddick to score easily and putting Varitek on second, and while you really couldn’t fault Hughes for that particular sequence, and he also managed to shockingly retire , who’s hit something like 1.000/1.000/4.000 on the season against the Yanks, it was still rather frustrating that Hughes was unable to hold his second lead of the game. Not only that, but aside from his fastball Hughes’ secondary offerings — or really, lack thereof — were once again pretty worthless. He barely even seems to throw his one-time bread-and-butter cutter anymore.

summoned to face — also hitting a robust 1.000/1.000/4.000 on the year against the Yanks — and Boone did what Boone does, as he not only didn’t retire the lefty Ellsbury, but yielded the worst possible result as Ellsbury went deep to break the tie and give the Red Sox a lead they wouldn’t relinquish. Oh, and not that it would really matter, but Jason Varitek would add a two-run homer in the 7th to put this thing completely out of reach.

Despite an elevated pitch count and a fairly laborious six innings of work, Beckett came back out for the 7th and promptly shut the Yankees down. That 7th likely represented the Yankees’ best chance of mounting a comeback, because with the 8th inning came , who they never seem to be able to do anything against except hit the occasional solo home run (.136/.269/.364 this season prior to this game’s perfect eighth), and the ninth brought , whose Yankee issues seem to be a thing of the past (.182/.217/.182 over 6 innings prior to his perfect ninth).

And thus, after blowing two leads, the Yankees fell to 3-11 on the season against the Sox, and are on the cusp of losing their seventh(!) straight series to the Red Sox, as not only gets to face the best non-Yankee offense in MLB but has to do it against , who co-owns the Yankees with . Good times.

Tagged with: • • •
 
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
Delicious Digg

11 Responses to Red Sox top Yanks in 9-5 see-saw game

  1. bornwithpinstripes says:
    September 1, 2011 at 4:44 am

    any body see tex??? way to step up mark, i think this is the tex we see in the playoffs..he does not belong in the three spot hitting LHed

    Reply
  2. Matt Imbrogno says:
    September 1, 2011 at 7:02 am

    The Varitek excuse me double, followed (one out later) by the Ellsbury homer, just sums up the entire season of NYY/BOS. Or, the inning when the Sox scored two:

    @mimbro1: Get Pedroia, Gonzalez, and Crawford out on a grounder, a fly ball, and a strikeout. Give up hits to Scutaro and Lowrie. #RAGE

    Reply
  3. Steve S. says:
    September 1, 2011 at 7:07 am

    I thought Hughes pitched better than his line, and was glad to see Girardi agreed after the game. Obviously the last runner was charged to him when Logan gave up the bomb to Ellsbury. The previous one was a walk and an excuse me triple (scored a Double) by Varitek. Do you know how many Triples Varitek has this year? One. Just horrendously bad luck there.

    The big mistake was to Ortiz, who’s just on fire right now. He got him out the previous AB on the same pitch, but you can’t go back to the well with a savvy veteran like him (who owns Phil) swinging the bat the way he is. In the playoffs, they’d just walk him in that spot, so I don’t worry about history repeating itself.

    Reply
  4. Duh, Innings! says:
    September 1, 2011 at 8:24 am

    Re: tonight.

    If Burnett pitches 5 IP 0-2 ER ball, I go batter to batter with him after 5 IP. If he gets the first batter out in the sixth, leave him in to get the second out, and so on.

    Burnett 5 IP then Wade, Soriano, Robertson, Rivera for the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th inning respectively.

    Reply
  5. Rich in NJ says:
    September 1, 2011 at 8:30 am

    Hughes just needs to pitch more. Taking him out of the rotation isn’t going to benefit him or the team.

    Reply
    • Marek says:
      September 1, 2011 at 8:35 am

      I think taking him out of the rotation might very well help the team in the sense that he tends to lose his starts. But of course, the question is who do you replace him with, and I don’t have a good answer for that.

      Reply
      • Rich in NJ says:
        September 1, 2011 at 9:14 am

        I see steady, although uneven, improvement in velo and command. He hasn’t pitched much as a starter since 2007, except for 2010. Patience will likely pay off.

        Reply
  6. Betsy says:
    September 1, 2011 at 8:41 am

    At this point, I don’t care if it’s AJ or Phil in the rotation. As Joel Sherman wrote today, the only thing Phil has going for him is that he’s not AJ…….He was very poor yet again -and yet again, his stuff declined. He had a chance to solidify his spot in the rotation and he failed to do it – a moth in his eye? Please.

    Phil is not going to pitch any meaningful innings in the post-season, fortunately. As to his future, he needs to come prepared to fight for a spot in 2012………him winning a spot is not a given.

    Reply
  7. Soup says:
    September 1, 2011 at 10:31 am

    I didn’t mean to cheat on my g/f but a moth flew in my eye.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.