(comic from geekandpoke.typepad.com)
Time Magazine recently released its list of the top 140 twitter accounts, and there were a number of accounts listed under the “sports” heading:
Old Hoss Radbourn
Eric Stangel
Dara Torres
Brian Wilson
Rory McIlroy
Apolo Ohno
Steve Nash
Rio Ferdinand
Chad Ochocinco
Shaquille O’Neal
My intial reaction to this list was one of amusement, and I suggested that these are the kind of accounts you might follow and adjudge to be among the best tweeters if you were not an interactive user. Ben Kabak of RAB followed up with the following that I thought succinctly summarized the problem with this list:
That’s why I said it’s so Time Magazine-y. Very passive, web 1.0 list of Twitter accounts. Few people who engage.
The list drives home the fact that there is a huge gulf between the general perception of Twitter and its actual utility. Most people see Twitter as a one way street, a tool to follow celebrities, funny people, and Eric Stangel without much interaction. To them, Twitter serves as an RSS feed to the thoughts of the interesting elite, which is why it may seem vapid to spend a lot of time using it. Whenever I tell people that I frequently utilize Twitter, they roll their eyes and ask me some variation of “Why do you care about Celebrity X’s dinner”?
But Twitter has the capability to be so much more, and for many of us it has become an invaluable implement in the sports fan toolbox. It has much greater utility as a social networking device than it does as a celebrity follower, and no greater example can be found in the sports world, where media members, bloggers, and fans have come together to build a vibrant network for discussion and debate about sports.
For many, Twitter has replaced the traditional forums and blogs as the primary means of interacting with other fans. Rather than commenting on a website or blog and constantly refreshing to see if anyone has responded, people engage other fans directly, receiving quick responses to their thoughts and questions and stimulating spirited debates about even the most minor of details impacting their favorite team. Questions or ideas that may have previously been discarded because they were too thin in detail or evidence to warrant a blog post or comment are thrown out regularly on Twitter, and are built into more fully developed ideas through discussion with other informed fans. Additionally, the ephemeral nature of Twitter makes people more comfortable in opening up a bit as to their own lives, which allows people to actually connect with other fans in a meaningful way. I know of many real friendships that began on Twitter, and can say that my fan experience has been greatly enhanced by the interaction that the medium allows for.
Twitter also serves as a news source, as reporters break news on Twitter with regularity, and users can count on being among the first to know when anything important happens in sports. Furthermore, readers can now directly question those media members with access to insiders, opening up avenues of information that were never available to the fans. No longer do you have to wait days to hear back from a writer when you offer an opinion on something he or she wrote, as you often can discuss the topic with the author minutes after his words become publicly available. Even some players have taken to interacting with their fans on Twitter, with guys such as Logan Morrison and CJ Wilson allowing the world to get to know them as people.
Taking all of these elements together, fans now have an amazing resource that allows them to combine intelligent debate, up to the minute news, and interaction with individuals who were previously difficult to reach, all in one easy to use medium. I am not going to say that the people using Twitter as the RSS Feed Of The Stars are misusing it, as everyone can make their own choices regarding how to utilize the medium, and I can respect those who are not looking for an interactive experience. But as the Time list suggests, Twitter needs to do a better job explaining the versatility and utility of their product to consumers, because there is so much more to Twitter than Eric Stangel.
(On that note, I strongly encourage all of our readers to join Twitter and participate in the discussion. Here are the accounts associated with TYA:
* TYA Twitter -
* EJ Fagan -
* Matt Imbrogno -
* William J. -
* Larry Koestler-
* Moshe Mandel -
* Sean P. -
* Eric Schultz -
It really is a great resource and plenty of fun. I look forward to interacting with those of you who decide to join.)
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
Twitter is a tool for people to stroke their egos. All the people pretending it’s not can kiss my natural, white, jewish ass. I don’t “report” or write on Twitter. Never have. Twitter don’t pay me. Twitter is not a media outlet. There are no journalists on Twitter.
[Reply]
Moshe Mandel Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 5:14 pm
Heh. For those who didn’t get it, this is what Jason Whitlock said on Twitter today. Pretty dumb. Well done, Hannah.
[Reply]
Marcus Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 7:20 pm
Reason 2001 for me to read or follow Mr. Narci….errr Jason Whitlock.
[Reply]
Moshe uses really foul and dirty language on twitter though, so if you’re not into that sort of thing, just follow me instead.
[Reply]
Moshe Mandel Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 5:44 pm
Sean quotes old surfing movies all day, so you might want to avoid him.
[Reply]
Larry Koestler Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 5:51 pm
All of the aforementioned TYA handles will also be featured among the top 140 Twitter accounts in the next issue of Mom’s Basement Monthly, so take that, Time Magazine.
Kidding aside, great post.
[Reply]
Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 5:57 pm
That movie is the shit. Back off Warchild, seriously.
[Reply]
Sean P. Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 6:05 pm
Wow- excellent, excellent comment. Well done sir.
[Reply]
Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 6:08 pm
Thank you.
(Spoken in my best, earnest Swayze-voice, of course.)
[Reply]
Moshe Mandel Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 6:06 pm
I know. I enjoyed it. Im just busting Sean’s chops.
[Reply]
If twitter is so great, why doesn’t your site here have a feed?
[Reply]
Moshe Mandel Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 7:15 pm
It does. It is listed in our sidebar and in this post. It is @yankeeanalysts
[Reply]
Brads Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 9:34 pm
I’m sorry–I think you might misunderstand my suggestion. If you check the Daily News Blogging the Bombers or Lohud Yankees blog, they have sidebars where there are running tweets from a variety of sources. I was suggesting you could implement the same here…pretty easy code to do…I have samples if you need it.
[Reply]
Moshe Mandel Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 9:59 pm
I had that on the old site, but it made the page load slower. I’ll consider it and test it, and see if it changes the functionality. Thanks for the suggestion.
[Reply]
Brads Reply:
March 30th, 2011 at 1:40 pm
You’re most welcome.
[Reply]
I agree 1000%. Getting to know the Yankee blogging community along with the beat writers is fun. Even though I haven’t met any of you IRL I feel as though I have. I’ll continue to engage @madefelice.
[Reply]
I try to explain this to my friends all the time. Twitter has such a negative stigma. I use it strictly as a news source and a way to interact with writers and fans whose opinion I value greatly.
Great post, Moshe.
[Reply]
I’m still getting used to using twitter. Its a great resource, and I will definitely be live-tweeting minor league games this season.
[Reply]
I was definitely mixed about twitter when I considered making an account, but I’ve definitely enjoyed the interaction with other sports fans, writers, bloggers, etc that the medium has facilitated. I’ve certainly learned a lot about my co-writers from reading their Twitter feeds.
[Reply]
[...] Moshe Mandel had a great post over at The Yankee Analysts yesterday. It’s about Twitter, and he keys on the biggest thing that keeps a lot of baseball fans off it: they misunderstand the point of it all. [...]